Taking Action Against ADA Wheelchair Accessibility Violations
posted on Oct 18 by Guest Author in the Advocacy, Disability Law, Disability News, Wheelchair Accessibility, Wheelchair Accessibility Laws categoryModesto Hernandez, a wheelchair user due to the effects of polio, is taking a stand against businesses that fail to accommodate the special needs of patrons with disabilities. Hernandez has filed more than 12 accessibility lawsuits against numerous New York shopping centers and locations including the Bronx Zoo, Cross County Shopping Center, the Nanuet Mall, and most recently the Midway Shopping Center in Scarsdale and Tanglewood Shopping Center in Yonkers. Hernandez’s lawsuit claims the establishments violated New York’s Civil Rights Law and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and his complaints mirror those of millions of persons with disabilities: curbs or walkways that are not designed for wheelchair use, counters and rails that are too high, and inaccessible parking for people with disabilities on excessively sloped ground, to name a few.
Hernandez is one of millions of people all over the U.S. who are exercising their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and holding businesses accountable for not providing adequate access for persons with disabilities. His lawsuits seek changes or modifications to improve accessibility and unspecified damages plus attorney’s fees. Plaintiffs involved in these types of lawsuits hope to send the message to businesses to bring their establishment up to code and make them accessible for all persons, regardless of their physical ability.
The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, local and state government, transportation, telecommunications, commercial facilities and public accommodations. Accessibility lawsuits have been on the rise in recent years. Oregon, Florida, Hawaii and California are considered “hot bed” states for accessibility lawsuits. California recently proposed Senate Bill 783, legislation that would give Californian businesses some relief from abusive accessibility lawsuits.
There’s a fine line, however, between a person having a legitimate complaint and a person being nit-picky. Defendants in accessibility lawsuits feel plaintiffs and their attorneys are abusing the ADA laws to make a profit. The plaintiffs insist they are acting on behalf of all persons with disabilities and doing their part to make all places accessible for everyone. Despite increased awareness of the needs of persons with disabilities, too many businesses and other establishments still lack adequate facilities to accommodate such persons. Furthermore, many of these establishments are reluctant to incur the expense to make the necessary changes. In many cases, change only comes when a business is sued.
Hernandez’s attorney insists that his client is not just going around looking for businesses to pick on. Hernandez’s job as a wheelchair repairman takes him all over the country making house calls and deliveries. If he notices a problem with accessibility at any particular place he visits, he calls his attorney.
One defendant has gotten the message and is taking corrective action. The Bronx Zoo agreed to 84 changes at their entrances, restrooms, signage, parking lots, and animal exhibits. The changes include installing accessible tables in the Terrace Cafe, lowering a handrail in the reptiles exhibit, and redesigning paths at the Tiger Mountain exhibit to reduce changes in level.
Will more architects and designers continue making accessibility a primary consideration when designing buildings and structures, so there will be less accessibility lawsuits in the future? What is your opinion of Hernandez and other plaintiffs like him bringing suit against frequented establishments? Is this the right way to go about bringing about accessibility to all–by having lawyers direct businesses to comply–or should these changes be left to established officials, like public health authorities? Weigh in here and let us know!
Source:
http://www.lohud.com/article/20111005/NEWS02/110050324/Wheelchair-user-sues-Scarsdale-Yonkers-malls-over-access-disabled
Image sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_County_Shopping_Center
http://newyorkguest.wordpress.com/2011/04/12/a-perfect-day-at-the-bronx-zoo/
http://www.ada.gov/
3 Comments
Lisa, posted this comment on Oct 22nd, 2011
Peter I SO agree, I have a daughter with CP and we have been to medical appts and can”t get into the bathroom. If my time was not wrapped up in her care I would create a job where I went to contracters/builders and trained them BUT alas many don”t care because the cost would be high and they”d lose the bid! Our mature and disabled society will not be the minority much longer and then what???
Dan, posted this comment on Feb 3rd, 2012
I”m disabled and use my electric Wheelchair when out and about and see MANY places inaccessable,,at a downtoem eatery I made my order on the sidewalk because I couln”t get in and ate in my chair outside out of a styroform Doggie plate thingy started to sprinkle and some inside looking out at me started to chuckle..Its the life we Live in a chair,,1990 ADA was put in place,,over 20 years later ,,same ole crap and the bussiness say lawsuits are harrassment,,I never made one,,thought about it many time–even called around to see how to get one started and NO–I Mean NOT one attorney would take on accessability ADA lawsuit,,they ALL go after ADA employment Violations,,, I believe Most WON”T take on ADA acessability just because they get targeted like Most of looking for just $$$$$$$ and made to look Bad,,,BTW I am Service connected Disabled Veteran and theirs many more out there now because of the wars recently,,,so instead of saying thank you for your service lets start thinking about that law thats being IGNORE from over 20 years ago..








Peter Batting, posted this comment on Oct 19th, 2011
I too am very concerned with wheelchair accessibility since my wife was diagnosed with parkinsons and uses a power wheelchair. There are too many establishmenst and venues which are not accessible at all and nothing will be done unless there is considerable pressure to do so. Unfortunately in this country that means a lawsuit. Even new establishments and venues don”t alwats get it right ( even some medical facilities I might add ) and it appears to me that very often design does not include input from those with disabilities who will be using the facility. A non-disabled person in many cases does not know ( or sometimes even care to find out )what works for those who are disabled. And Government officials are many times the worst. So as things stand I applaud those who make the effort to look out for those who can”t look out for themselves, even if it means lawsuits. Of course in my mind, other than coverng expenses of a suit or any damages to the litigant any awards should go to agencies who have demonstrated their willingness to improve accessibility everwhere and can use funds to do so. No one person should benefit from such suits as the main purpose is to correct situations for all.